Darwinbox vs Keka: what each publishes, and where a smaller company lands
Darwinbox and Keka is a good fit for
Darwinbox: enterprises of 1,000 or more employees, the segment Gartner lists it in and its own pages address. Keka: companies from 10 to 10,000 people, Keka's own range.
Flowy is a good fit for
Companies with 100 to 1,000 employees that want the essential work of HR on one record, with the labour-code rules checked before payroll runs.
| Darwinbox and Keka | Flowy | |
|---|---|---|
| Who it is for | Darwinbox: an AI-native HCM for 1,000+ employee enterprises, per the Gartner listing it cites. Keka: growing companies from 10 to 10,000, per its payroll page. | 100 to 1,000 employees, often across states or with contract workers. |
| Scale, in their words | Darwinbox: 1,400+ customers, 6 million+ users, 130+ countries. Keka: 12,500+ companies. | Early: a handful of Indian companies, named on our customers page as each agrees to be. |
| Pricing | Neither publishes a price. Keka lists plan names, a free trial and a setup fee; Darwinbox has no pricing page. | No published price yet; the range is being finalised. |
| Security claims | Darwinbox states ISO 27001, SOC 2 and GDPR compliance on a landing page. Keka attributes SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 to its cloud providers. | None yet. What is in place is on our security and DPDP page. |
| The labour codes | No Darwinbox page found that states a position on the codes. Keka publishes a guide for its admins to review salary structures; neither describes a 50% wage-rule check. | Every payroll run computes PF and gratuity on wages floored at 50%, and lists each structure that falls short. |
What we say about Darwinbox and Keka was checked on 22 October 2026 against darwinbox.com/about-us/our-story; darwinbox.com/llms.txt; darwinbox.com/products/payroll/payroll-for-india; explore.darwinbox.com/lp/hr-software; keka.com (home page); keka.com/pricing; keka.com/security. If something has changed, tell us and we will correct it.
Both are large, well-funded suites, and their own pages place them in different markets: Darwinbox in the enterprise, Keka from small to large. For a company of 100 to 1,000 employees the question is usually Keka or something narrower.
Flowy is the narrower option: the essential work of HR, one record from hiring to exit, and the statutory rules in the engine. It publishes no certifications yet and no price yet, and says so here.
Questions
Darwinbox or Keka for a 300-person company?
By their own positioning, Keka: Darwinbox addresses enterprises of 1,000 or more. A 300-person company that wants fewer modules and the labour-code rules applied in the engine should also look at Flowy.
Where were these claims checked?
On each vendor's own pages, listed under sources, on 22 October 2026. Third-party price estimates were not used, because the vendors publish none.
See it on your own data
A 10-minute Health Check on three of your salary grades, anonymised. Not a demo; you keep the result either way.